Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
This study investigates in-work poverty within the local context of an Italy’s province with two main objectives: (1) assessing whether the main individual and household-level risk factors identified by national and international research are also valid at subnational level, even in contexts where poverty is relatively less widespread; (2) evaluating the feasibility and adequacy of using administrative data sources to study socio-economic vulnerability. The broader goal is to contribute to the understanding of in-work poverty by exploring its determinants within a localized context and by testing the potential and added value of existing data infrastructures. The analysis focuses on the province of Reggio Emilia, using microdata from CAF-CGIL users. While the dataset is not statistically representative and lacks certain key variables - such as working hours, education, and industry - nonetheless it offers a rich, replicable data resource for local-level research. Empirical findings confirm the relevance of established risk factors such as household composition and labour market attachment. The incidence of in-work poverty is particularly high among foreign citizens, single-parent households, and large families. Furthermore, logistic regression models highlight the so-called “gender paradox”: women living with partner are generally less likely to be working poor, but in single-earner households female workers face a significantly greater risk. This outcome reflects gendered economic dependence and household dynamics, contributing to the broader debate on in-work poverty and its determinants at the local level.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Truscello et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: