Retrospective study reveals high long-term device survival and continence in men with stress urinary incontinence, highlighting the safety and durability of the adjustable system.
BACKGROUND: stress urinary incontinence (SUI) still represents a major drawback of prostate surgery. The aim of this study is to evaluate long term efficacy, safety and survival of ATOMS system implant in a single center. METHODS: we retrospectively included al consecutive patients treated with ATOMS implant for SUI from October 2014 to July 2019. Patients received anamnesis, urodynamic evaluation, pre- and postoperative 24 h pad test and count. Patients were considered "continent" when dry or when wearing a security pad (social continence). RESULTS: we treated99 patientswith median age 77.98 years (IQR 72.7-82.52). Most of the patients had undergone radical prostatectomy. Median follow-up was 62.9 months (IQR 47.5-75.9). At last follow-up 74 (74.7%) patients reported continence. We had 21 early (<30 days) postoperative complications, all Clavien-Dindo (CD) grade 1 [11 temporary perineal pain, 4 urinary retention, 3 scrotal edema, 2 superficial wound dehiscence, 1 dysuria]. We had late postoperative complications in 28 patients [7 port dislocations requiring surgical repositioning (CD 3a), 6 device removals (CD 3a) due to port erosion (2), inefficacy (2), cushion leakage (1), mesh detachment (1), perineal pain (5), 2 cases of port extrusion solved with port removal leaving the device in place (CD 3a), 2 superficial wound dehiscence (CD 1), 2 UTI (CD 1), 1 scrotal edema (CD 1), 1 cushion deflate (CD 1), 1 dysuria (CD 1), 1 perineal pain (CD 1)]. The survival of the device was 97% at 12 months, 93% at 24 months, 91% at 36 months, 90% at 48 months and 87.9% at 60 months. CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates the good safety and efficacy of ATOMS implant for the treatment of SUI.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Giammò et al. (2023) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: