It is known that if two optical images of a visually textured surface, projected from finitely separated viewpoints, allow more than one 3D interpretation, then the surface must be part of a quadric passing through the two viewpoints. It is here shown that this quadric is either a plane or a ruled surface of a type first considered by Maybank in a study of ambiguous optic flow fields; and that in the latter case, three is the maximum number of distinct interpretations that the two images can sustain.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Hugh Christopher Longuet-Higgins (1988) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: