Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
The goal of this study was to estimate aboveground stand carbon (AGSC) of pure beech stands in Turkey with ground measurements as well as topographic information and remote sensing data. For this purpose, 153 sample plots were collected from pure beech stands in study area. The AGSC of each sample plot was computed. Eight texture images (variance, dissimilarity, homogeneity, entropy, contrast, mean, second moment and correlation) with five window sizes (3 × 3, 5 × 5, 7 × 7, 9 × 9 and 11 × 11) generated from ALOS PALSAR L-band satellite image. The AGSC models predicting the relationships between ALOS PALSAR texture values and topographic information, and sample plot AGSC were developed by using multiple linear regressions (MLR). Also, artificial neural networks (ANNs) architectures were trained by comparing various numbers of neurons and activation functions in its network types. Our results revealed the ability of ANNs was better than MLR models to predict AGSC values.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Günlü et al. (2018) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: