This is the authors' abstract. We don't add key points for this paper.
This study follows our previous investigation of charge carrier dynamics at the hole transport layer (HTL)/perovskite (CsPbBr 3 ) interface, where pattern-illumination time-resolved phase microscopy (PI–PM) revealed that HTLs significantly influence hole extraction and charge recombination processes. In the absence of an HTL, CsPbBr 3 exhibited dominant hole dynamics, which were mitigated by the introduction of Spiro-OMeTAD and P3HT, with the latter showing superior hole extraction efficiency. In this follow-up study, we extend our analysis to electron transport layers (ETLs) and the full ETL/perovskite/HTL structure, and investigate modulation of charge separation at interfaces. Our results show that TiO 2, a widely used ETL, enhances electron extraction but still exhibits recombination due to interfacial states. Li and Pt doping further improve charge separation, with Pt-doped TiO 2 demonstrating the most significant reduction in recombination and the longest charge carrier lifetimes. When combined with HTLs, the choice of HTL significantly impacts charge extraction: P3HT facilitates more efficient hole removal than Spiro-OMeTAD. The most effective configuration for charge separation and suppression of residual charge carriers was achieved with Pt-doped TiO 2 as the ETL and P3HT as the HTL. These findings provide a comprehensive understanding of charge carrier transport in inorganic perovskite solar cells, demonstrating the importance of both ETL and HTL selection for optimizing photovoltaic performance.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ito et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: