Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Theoretical analysis explores AI-driven hypothesis generation in chemistry, demonstrating how statistical predictions reshape the logic of scientific discovery.
Explanation is a foundational goal in the exact sciences. Besides the contemporary considerations on ‘description’, ‘classification’, and ‘prediction’, we often see these terms in thriving applications of artificial intelligence (AI) in chemistry hypothesis generation. Going beyond describing ‘things in the world’, these applications can make accurate numerical property calculations from theoretical or topological descriptors. This association makes an interesting case for a logic of discovery in chemistry: are these induction-led ventures showing a shift in how chemists can problematize research questions? In this article, I present a fresh perspective on the current context of discovery in chemistry. I argue how data-driven statistical predictions in chemistry can be explained as a quasi-logical process for generating chemical theories, beyond the classic examples of organic and theoretical chemistry. Through my position on formal models of scientific explanation, I demonstrate how the dawn of AI can provide novel insights into the explanatory power of scientific endeavors.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
José Ferraz-Caetano (2023) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: