Why the study?
Schizophrenia diagnosis and treatment depend on symptom severity, but assessments can be time-consuming and subjective, prompting the exploration of automated machine learning methods for fine-grained symptom estimation.
Machine learning methods utilizing multiple modalities hold promise for providing consistent and accurate fine-grained symptom estimation in schizophrenia.
Automated schizophrenia assessments may aid personalized diagnosis; leaves open prospective validation before clinical adoption.
Schizophrenia is a severe yet treatable mental disorder, it is diagnosed using a multitude of primary and secondary symptoms. Diagnosis and treatment for each individual depends on the severity of the symptoms, therefore there is a need for accurate, personalised assessments. However, the process can be both time-consuming and subjective; hence, there is a motivation to explore automated methods that can offer consistent diagnosis and precise symptom assessments, thereby complementing the work of healthcare practitioners. Machine Learning has demonstrated impressive capabilities across numerous domains, including medicine; the use of Machine Learning in patient assessment holds great promise for healthcare professionals and patients alike, as it can lead to more consistent and accurate symptom estimation.This survey aims to review methodologies that utilise Machine Learning for diagnosis and assessment of schizophrenia. Contrary to previous reviews that primarily focused on binary classification, this work recognises the complexity of the condition and instead, offers an overview of Machine Learning methods designed for fine-grained symptom estimation. We cover multiple modalities, namely Medical Imaging, Electroencephalograms and Audio-Visual, as the illness symptoms can manifest themselves both in a patient's pathology and behaviour. Finally, we analyse the datasets and methodologies used in the studies and identify trends, gaps as well as opportunities for future research.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Foteinopoulou et al. (2023) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: