Why the study?
What are the most cost-effective strategies for the acute management of atrial fibrillation?
What are the most cost-effective strategies for the acute management of atrial fibrillation?
Standardized clinical pathways are recommended to improve the cost-effectiveness of acute atrial fibrillation management.
May support acute AF pathways for efficiency; leaves open randomized economic trials before practice change.
Atrial fibrillation is the most common sustained arrhythmia likely to be encountered in clinical practice. It is associated with significant morbidity and mortality. The treatment of patients with atrial fibrillation can be complex and costly, especially when patients are hospitalized for acute management of this arrhythmia. In this review, we summarize current approaches to the acute management of atrial fibrillation with an emphasis on the most cost-effective approaches. We review acute methods of heart rate control and cardioversion, including pharmacologic and other minimally invasive strategies. We believe that the most cost-effective approaches may require the use of standardized clinical pathways. This may help to ensure that patients with acute atrial fibrillation receive the most effective and efficient care.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Dell’Orfano et al. (2000) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: