Cross-sectional validation reveals acceptable reliability and construct validity of the Tibetan GAD-7 in high-altitude populations, highlighting key demographic disparities in anxiety.
Objective To translate the Generalized Anxiety Disorder-7 (GAD-7) scale into Tibetan and evaluate its psychometric properties for assessing anxiety symptoms of the Tibetan communities living in high altitudes. Methodology Following a standardized translation and cross-cultural adaptation procedure, the Tibetan GAD-7 was administered to 583 adults recruited via convenience sampling in Tibetan areas. Its reliability was assessed using Cronbach’s alpha and item-total correlations. Construct validity was examined using Exploratory Factor Analysis (EFA, n = 290) and Confirmatory Factor Analysis (CFA, n = 293) by randomly splitting the sample into two halves. Group differences in GAD-7 scores across sociodemographic variables were analyzed using t-tests and Analysis of Variance (ANOVA). Results The Tibetan GAD-7 demonstrated acceptable internal consistency (Cronbach’s α = 0.70). EFA suggested a two-factor structure, which was further supported by CFA, showing a significantly better model fit (CFI = 0.90, TLI = 0.82, RMSEA = 0.09) than a one-factor model (CFI = 0.71, TLI = 0.57, RMSEA = 0.14). Significant group differences were also found, with females, urban residents, and individuals with lower household income reporting higher anxiety scores. Conclusion The Tibetan version of the GAD-7 shows acceptable reliability and validity as a screening tool for generalized anxiety symptoms in high-altitude Tibetan populations. Its use can facilitate early identification of anxiety in this underserved, culturally distinct community with limited mental health resources.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Fu et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: