Why the study?
Automatic quantification of LV function could enhance workflow and assist inexperienced clinicians, motivating the establishment of normal reference values for automatic measurements of MAPSE, S', e', and a' and their comparison with manual measurements.
Do automatic measurements of tissue Doppler indices of mitral annular motion align with manual measurements in healthy individuals?
Do automatic measurements of tissue Doppler indices of mitral annular motion align with manual measurements in healthy individuals?
Automatic measurements of left ventricular function indices using tissue Doppler imaging are comparable to manual measurements and can provide quick and precise interpretation of LV function.
Automatic LV measurements may streamline focused ultrasound workflows; leaves open prospective outcome validation before clinical adoption.
BACKGROUND: Automatic quantification of left ventricular (LV) function could enhance workflow for cardiologists and assist inexperienced clinicians who perform focused cardiac ultrasound. We have developed an algorithm for automatic measurements of the mitral annular plane systolic excursion (MAPSE) and peak velocities in systole (S') and early (e') and late (a') diastole. We aimed to establish normal reference values for the automatic measurements and to compare them with manual measurements. METHODS AND RESULTS: Healthy participants (n = 1157, 52.5% women) from the HUNT3 cross-sectional population study in Norway were included. The mean age ± standard deviation (SD) was 49 ± 14 (range: 19-89) years. The algorithm measured MAPSE, S', e', and a' from apical 4-chamber color tissue Doppler imaging (cTDI) recordings. The manual measurements were obtained by two echocardiographers, who measured MAPSE by M-mode and the velocities by cTDI. For men and women, age-specific reference values were created for groups (mean ± 1.96SD) and by linear regression (mean, 95% prediction interval). Age was negatively correlated with MAPSE, S', and e' and positively correlated with a'. There were small differences between genders. Normal reference ranges were created. The coefficients of variation between automatic and manual measurements ranged from 5.5% (S') to 11.7% (MAPSE). CONCLUSION: Normal reference values for automatic measurements of LV function indices are provided. The automatic measurements were in line with the manual measurements. Implementing automatic measurements and comparison with normal ranges in ultrasound scanners can allow for quick and precise interpretation of LV function.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Grue et al. (2019) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: