Key result
Automated Doppler analysis matches specialist accuracy while reducing measurement time by ~60%.
Why the study?
Manual selection of sampling positions for transmitral PW Doppler and annular tissue Doppler velocity measurements is time-consuming and variable, especially for less experienced operators.
Observational (n=20)
Absolute Event Rate: 3.6% vs 4.5%
BACKGROUND: Transmitral pulse wave (PW) Doppler and annular tissue Doppler velocity measurements provide valuable diagnostic and prognostic information. However, they depend on an echocardiographer manually selecting positions to make the measurements. This is time-consuming and open to variability, especially by less experienced operators. We present a new, automated method to select consistent Doppler velocity sites to measure blood flow and muscle function. METHODS: Our automated algorithm combines speckle tracking and colour flow mapping to locate the septal and lateral mitral valve annuli (to measure peak early diastolic velocity, E') and the mitral valve inflow (to measure peak inflow velocity, E). We also automate peak velocity measurements from resulting PW Doppler traces. The algorithm-selected locations and time taken to identify them were compared against a panel of echo specialists - the current "gold standard". RESULTS: The algorithm identified positions to measure Doppler velocities within 3.6 ± 2.2mm (mitral inflow), 3.2 ± 1.8mm (septal annulus) and 3.8 ± 1.5mm (lateral annulus) of the consensus of 3 specialists. This was less than the average 4mm fidelity with which the specialists could themselves identify the points. The automated algorithm could potentially reduce the time taken to make these measurements by 60 ± 15%. CONCLUSIONS: Our automated algorithm identified sampling positions for measurement of mitral flow, septal and lateral tissue velocities as reliably as specialists. It provides a rapid, easy method for new specialists and potentially non-specialists to make automated measurements of key cardiac physiological indices. This could help support decision-making, without introducing delay and extend availability of echocardiography to more patients.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Dhutia et al. (2010) conducted an observational in No significant echocardiological abnormality (n=20). Automated algorithm (speckle tracking and colour flow mapping) vs. Manual selection by echo specialists was evaluated on Average distance from specialist consensus position for mitral inflow (mm). An automated algorithm identified Doppler measurement positions as reliably as echo specialists, within an average of 3.8 mm of consensus, and reduced the time required for measurements by 60%.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: