Why the study?
Guidelines recommend ICD therapy for EF ≤35% 6-12 weeks post-AMI, but whether early stress echocardiography before discharge could identify ICD candidates was unknown.
Does stress echocardiography add incremental value to baseline ejection fraction for the early identification of candidates for implantable defibrillators in patients with EF ≤40% early after AMI?
Does stress echocardiography add incremental value to baseline ejection fraction for the early identification of candidates for implantable defibrillators in patients with EF ≤40% early after AMI?
Stress echocardiography performed early after an acute myocardial infarction does not provide incremental value over baseline ejection fraction for predicting which patients will meet ICD implantation criteria at 3 months.
Early stress echocardiography after AMI may detect viability; leaves open its role in refining post-MI risk stratification or ICD decisions.
Objective: A reduction in left ventricular ejection fraction (EF) remains the strongest indicator of increased risk of sudden cardiac death after an acute myocardial infarction (AMI). Guidelines recommend that patients with an EF ≤35%, 6-12 weeks after AMI should be considered for implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) therapy. Stress echocardiography is a safe method to detect viability in a stunned myocardium. The purpose of this study was to investigate if stress echocardiography early after AMI could identify ICD candidates before discharge. Methods: Ninety-six patients with EF ≤40% early after AMI were prospectively included in a cohort study, and investigated by baseline and stress echocardiography before discharge. Follow-up echocardiography was performed after 3 months. EF, mitral annular plane systolic excursion (MAPSE) and peak systolic velocity (PSV) were determined for each examination. Results: There were 80 (83%) patients who completed the baseline, stress and follow-up echocardiography. Among them there were 32 (40%) patients who met the ICD criteria of EF ≤35% at 3 months. For these patients, EF, MAPSE and PSV were significantly lower than for those patients who recovered. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) was 85% (95% CI 0.74 to 0.94) for baseline EF to predict non-recovery. None of the other variables had a higher AUC. Conclusion: Patients who met the ICD criteria of EF ≤35% at 3 months after myocardial infarction had lower EF, MAPSE and PSV on baseline and stress echocardiograph before discharge. Stress echocardiography did not add additional value in predicting non-recovery.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Muhrbeck et al. (2019) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: