This is the authors' abstract. We don't add key points for this paper.
In this work, the commercial selective catalytic reduction (SCR) catalyst V 2 O 5 –MoO 3 /TiO 2 was sulfureted with H 2 S to improve both its capability for elemental mercury (Hg 0 ) removal at low temperatures and its resistance to SO 2 and H 2 O. Hg 0 removal over both V 2 O 5 –MoO 3 /TiO 2 and sulfureted V 2 O 5 –MoO 3 /TiO 2 involved the catalytic oxidation of Hg 0 to HgCl 2 and the chemical adsorption of gaseous Hg 0; therefore, the effect of sulfuration on Hg 0 chemical adsorption and the catalytic oxidation of Hg 0 to HgCl 2 over V 2 O 5 –MoO 3 /TiO 2 and its resistance to SO 2 and H 2 O were investigated using Hg balance analysis. Kinetic analysis showed that the rates of the chemical adsorption and oxidation of Hg 0 were both in direct proportion to the concentration of physically adsorbed Hg 0 . The physical adsorption of gaseous Hg 0 on V 2 O 5 –MoO 3 /TiO 2 was remarkably promoted after sulfuration, and the physical adsorption of gaseous Hg 0 over sulfureted V 2 O 5 –MoO 3 /TiO 2 was scarcely inhibited by SO 2 and H 2 O. Therefore, the performance of V 2 O 5 –MoO 3 /TiO 2 for Hg 0 removal and its resistance to SO 2 and H 2 O were both improved after sulfuration. Even more remarkably, sulfureted V 2 O 5 –MoO 3 /TiO 2 can adsorb gaseous HgCl 2, which resulted from Hg 0 oxidation. Therefore, sulfureted V 2 O 5 –MoO 3 /TiO 2 showed an excellent performance to recover Hg 0 from coal-fired power plants, which can then be converted to liquid Hg.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Wang et al. (2021) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: