Why the study?
Returning individuals to work in high-hazard occupations following symptomatic COVID-19 infection requires excluding significant underlying cardiopulmonary disease, necessitating appropriate screening and investigative processes.
This position statement outlines a pragmatic, tiered screening and investigative process for the cardiopulmonary assessment of individuals returning to high-hazard occupations after symptomatic COVID-19.
Guides safe return-to-work decisions after symptomatic COVID-19 in high-hazard roles; extends EAPC preventive cardiology consensus to occupational settings.
This article provides an overview of the recommendations of the Aviation and Occupational Cardiology Task Force of the European Association of Preventive Cardiology on returning individuals to work in high-hazard occupations (such as flying, diving, and workplaces that are remote from healthcare facilities) following symptomatic Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) infection. This process requires exclusion of significant underlying cardiopulmonary disease and this consensus statement (from experts across the field) outlines the appropriate screening and investigative processes that should be undertaken. The recommended response is based on simple screening in primary healthcare to determine those at risk, followed by first line investigations, including an exercise capacity assessment, to identify the small proportion of individuals who may have circulatory, pulmonary, or mixed disease. These individuals can then receive more advanced, targeted investigations. This statement provides a pragmatic, evidence-based approach for those (in all occupations) to assess employee health and capacity prior to a return to work following severe disease, or while continuing to experience significant post-COVID-19 symptoms (so-called 'long-COVID' or post-COVID-19 syndrome).
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Rienks et al. (2022) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: