Key result
Single-cell sequencing identifies marked endothelial cell heterogeneity and impaired thrombosis regulation in CTEPH.
Why the study?
Endothelial cells regulate thrombosis and thrombus resolution, but their molecular phenotypes in CTEPH are incompletely understood.
Observational (n=5)
No
Endothelial heterogeneity in CTEPH merits functional studies; leaves open roles in thrombosis and therapeutic targeting.
Chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension (CTEPH) is a life-threatening condition characterized by unresolved thrombi obstructing the pulmonary arteries. Endothelial cells (ECs) are essential regulators of thrombosis and thrombus resolution, yet their molecular phenotypes in CTEPH are incompletely understood. Using single-cell RNA sequencing of CTEPH surgical specimens and control ECs from the Human Lung Cell Atlas, we uncover marked EC heterogeneity in CTEPH. Compared to controls, CTEPH ECs display marked phenotypic shifts, with the loss and emergence of distinct EC subpopulations, including a unique subset co-expressing pulmonary and bronchial EC markers. Our analysis reveals perturbed endothelial thrombosis regulation, encompassing coagulation, fibrinolysis, inflammation, TGF-β signaling, and angiogenesis, while identifying novel target genes. These findings provide a comprehensive view of endothelial contributions to delayed thrombus resolution, offering new insights into the pathophysiology of CTEPH and potential therapeutic targets.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Man et al. (2025) conducted an observational in Chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension (CTEPH) (n=5). Chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension vs. Control endothelial cells from the Human Lung Cell Atlas was evaluated on Endothelial cell transcriptomic profiles and heterogeneity. Single-cell RNA sequencing of CTEPH surgical specimens revealed marked endothelial cell heterogeneity, including a unique subset co-expressing pulmonary and bronchial markers, and perturbed thrombosis regulation.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: