Why the study?
Does pulmonary endarterectomy combined with aggressive perioperative pulmonary vasodilator therapy improve early survival and pulmonary hemodynamics in patients with chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension?
Does pulmonary endarterectomy combined with aggressive perioperative pulmonary vasodilator therapy improve early survival and pulmonary hemodynamics in patients with chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension?
Aggressive perioperative pulmonary vasodilator therapy, including epoprostenol sodium, during pulmonary endarterectomy for CTEPH is associated with favorable early survival and significant immediate improvements in pulmonary hemodynamics.
Objectives: Pulmonary endarterectomy (PEA) for chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension (CTEPH) is technically demanding. We reviewed the surgical outcomes of consecutive patients who underwent PEA with aggressive use of pulmonary vasodilators, including epoprostenol sodium. Methods: We retrospectively assessed perioperative clinical data of 122 patients with CTEPH who underwent PEA with hypothermic circulatory arrest between 2005 and 2013. Peri-operatively, all of the patients received pulmonary vasodilator therapy, including epoprostenol sodium and beraprost sodium. Results: Patients were classified as having CTEPH type 1 (n=57), type 2 (n=32), and type 3 (n=33) disease according to the Jamison classification system. In-hospital mortality was 7.4% (n=9), caused by right heart failure (n=5), pulmonary hemorrhage (n=3), and pneumonia (n=1). The 113 patients who survived PEA showed significantly decreased mPAP (46±11 to 23±10 mmHg, P<0.01) and PVR (826±357 to 237±153 dyne·s–1·cm–5, P<0.01). Conclusions: Aggressive pulmonary vasodilator treatment during surgical PEA results in favorable early outcomes. This treatment also leads to immediate and substantial improvement in pulmonary hemodynamics in patients with CTEPH.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Sakurai et al. (2017) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: