Why the study?
Do changes in heart rate variability predict the need for hospitalization in patients with acute exacerbation of COPD after emergency department treatment?
Do changes in heart rate variability predict the need for hospitalization in patients with acute exacerbation of COPD after emergency department treatment?
Changes in heart rate variability parameters (ΔHF% >7.1 or ΔLF/HF% ≦-0.39) after 24 hours of ED treatment can help predict the need for hospitalization in patients with AECOPD.
BACKGROUND: Indexes of heart rate variability (HRV) appear to reflect severity and may have prognostic value in patients with acute exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (AECOPD). We hypothesized that AECOPD without adequate treatment response would demonstrate impaired cardiac autonomic regulation and changes in HRV after emergency department (ED) treatment. METHODS: A prospective study of measuring HRV in admitted and discharged patients with AECOPD shortly after ED arrival and again 24 h after treatment. RESULTS: Total consecutive 33 patients (18 admitted and 15 discharged, age 77.1 ± 1.6 years) were enrolled. Among admitted patients, high frequency in normalized unit (HF%) was significantly lower (P < 0.001) while Ratio of LF to HF (LF/HF ratio) was significantly higher (P < 0.001) than discharged. 24 h after treatment, admitted patients had a significantly larger increase in HF% (P < 0.002) and larger decrease in LF/HF ratio (P < 0.05) than discharged. ROC curve analysis show the relative potential of the ΔHF% and ΔLF/HF% in the discrimination of groups. The area under the ROC curve between the 2 groups was 0.807 (P < 0.01) and 0.722 (P < 0.05), respectively. The best cut-off value for the admission between groups was ΔHF% >7.1 and ΔLF/HF% ≦-0.39. CONCLUSION: Patients with AECOPD requiring admission after ED treatment had a greater increase in HF% and greater decrease in LF/HF ratio compared to those discharged. Our study demonstrates patient with ΔHF% was >7.1 or a ΔLF/HF% ≦-0.39 require admission despite 24 h of ED treatment.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Tseng et al. (2017) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: