Why the study?
The study investigated the effects of Tai Chi on cerebral hemodynamic parameters and other health-related factors in community older adults at risk of ischemic stroke.
Does a 12-week supervised Tai Chi program improve cerebral hemodynamics and cardiovascular risk factors in older community adults at risk of ischemic stroke?
Does a 12-week supervised Tai Chi program improve cerebral hemodynamics and cardiovascular risk factors in older community adults at risk of ischemic stroke?
A 12-week supervised Tai Chi program improved cerebral hemodynamics, balance, and cardiovascular risk factors in older adults at risk for ischemic stroke, suggesting it may be a useful behavioral strategy for stroke prevention.
Supports Tai Chi in stroke prevention programs for older adults; extends RCT evidence on exercise and cerebral hemodynamics.
This study investigated the effects of Tai Chi compared with no exercise control on the cerebral hemodynamic parameters and other health-related factors in community older adults at risk of ischemic stroke. A total of 170 eligible participants were randomly allocated to Tai Chi or control group. The cerebral hemodynamic parameters and physical fitness risk factors of cardiovascular disease were measured at baseline, 12 weeks, and 24 weeks. After the 12-week intervention, Tai Chi significantly improved the minimum of blood flow velocity (BFV min ); BFV mean ; pulsatility index and resistance index of the right anterior cerebral artery; and BFV max , BFV min , and BFV mean parameters of the right middle cerebral artery. Tai Chi training also decreased triglyceride, fasting blood glucose, and homocysteine levels, and improved balance ability. Therefore, the supervised 12-week Tai Chi exercise had potential beneficial effects on cerebral hemodynamics, plasma risk factors, and balance ability in older community adults at risk of ischemic stroke.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Zheng et al. (2019) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: