A practical common weight multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) methodology with an improved discriminating power for technology selection is introduced. The proposed MCDM methodology enables the evaluation of the relative efficiency of decision-making units (DMUs) with respect to multiple outputs and a single exact input. Its robustness and discriminating power are illustrated via a previously reported robot evaluation problem by comparing the ranking obtained by the proposed MCDM framework with that obtained by the cross-efficiency analysis, which is a well-known data envelopment analysis-based methodology. The results indicate that the proposed methodology enables further ranking of data envelopment analysis-efficient DMUs with a notable saving in computations compared with cross-efficiency analysis. Finally, the proposed MCDM framework is extended to incorporate ordinal as well as exact outputs, and an application is presented to illustrate the methodology.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Karsak et al. (2005) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: