Why the study?
What is the incidence and epidemiology of injury in amateur and professional boxing?
What is the incidence and epidemiology of injury in amateur and professional boxing?
Boxing has acute injury rates comparable to or lower than other contact sports, with most injuries occurring to the head region during bouts rather than training.
Injury surveillance data support targeted head protection in boxing bouts; extends sparse incidence estimates but leaves open need for prospective trials.
BACKGROUND: There is concern over the potential for a high incidence of injury in boxing. This is despite a lack of prospective data evaluating the risk for modern day participants. Updated, reliable data with a focus on potential exposure to injury for both amateur and, especially, professional boxers is required. AIM: To determine the epidemiology of injury and exposure of amateur and professional boxers in Victoria, Australia. METHODS: A prospective cohort study with one year follow up was carried out over 2004-2005. Thirty three amateur and 14 active professional boxers registered with either Boxing Victoria Inc (amateurs) or the Professional Boxing and Combat Sports Board of Victoria (professionals) volunteered. Exposure at training and competition was measured, and any injuries sustained during this participation were recorded. RESULTS: Twenty one injuries were sustained by the cohort during the follow up period. Most were to the head region (71%; 95% confidence interval -3.7 to 89.4), with concussion being the most common (33%). An overall injury rate of 2.0 injuries per 1000 hours of boxing was calculated. CONCLUSION: The high exposure experienced by the boxers (as a result of considerable training time) indicated that boxing has acute injury rates comparable to, and often lower than, those found in other contact and non-contact sports. Further, acute injuries during training appear to be less common and severe than those sustained in bouts.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Zazryn et al. (2006) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 4 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: