Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Introduction: This experimental laboratory study aimed to evaluate the surface roughness (Ra and Rz) and the shape of surface topography (Rsk) following two different types of surface instrumentation.Method: Twenty-one MegaGen® implant abutments were divided into three different groups.In group 1, the abutments were left un-instrumented as a control, in group 2, rubber cups with pumice were used or treated and in group 3, the instrumentation was done using Er, Cr: YSGG laser with a wavelength of 2780nm, 1.5W power setting with the pulse repetition rate of 30Hz and applied using a radical firing perio tip for two minutes.Quantitative and qualitative evaluations were done using a profilometer.Results: Results showed no significant differences in Ra value among the tested groups whereas the significant differences in Rz value were observed among all treated groups (p<0.05) as the p-value equal to 0.02 and 0.01 in pumice-laser and control-laser groups respectively.The shape of 3D surface topography (Rsk) was found to be the same in the laser-treated and control groups, with the presence of more valley, lesser peak and the possibility of deep scratches Er, Cr: YSGG laser produced rougher abutment surface and able to maintain manufacturer lines, in comparison with the control group.Conclusions: In contrast, rubber cups and pumice could produce smoother surface outcomes.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Aspanut et al. (2023) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: