Why the study?
Does a 4D dark-blood MRI method accurately measure arterial lumen and wall areas compared to established MRI techniques in volunteer and patient subjects?
Does a 4D dark-blood MRI method accurately measure arterial lumen and wall areas compared to established MRI techniques in volunteer and patient subjects?
A novel 4D dark-blood MRI method provides feasible, submillimeter isotropic spatial resolution imaging of the human arterial wall and its motion over the cardiac cycle, with measurements agreeing with established techniques.
May enable dynamic arterial wall imaging; extends technical validation but leaves open clinical adoption pending larger studies.
PURPOSE: To propose and test a four-dimensional (4D) dark-blood magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) method based on a radial sampling trajectory capable of displaying the human arterial wall and its motion in three spatial dimensions over the cardiac cycle. METHODS: The carotid arteries of volunteer and patient subjects were imaged with the proposed 4D dark-blood MRI sequence on a 3T scanner. Validation of arterial lumen and arterial wall areas obtained with the proposed 4D dark-blood technique was made with respect to established two-dimensional bright-blood cine and high spatial resolution three-dimensional dark-blood MRI protocols, respectively. RESULTS: The proposed 4D MRI method provided for dark-blood display of the carotid arterial wall and demonstrated its movement and distension over the cardiac cycle. Quantitative measurements of arterial lumen and wall areas were in statistical agreement with established MRI techniques. CONCLUSION: 4D blood suppressed MRI of the human vascular system with submillimeter isotropic spatial resolution is feasible in a clinically reasonable scan time, and data obtained in the carotid arteries show good agreement with established MRI techniques. Future efforts will examine the constellation of data provided by the method and investigate its utility for assessing cardiovascular risk.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ioannis Koktzoglou (2013) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: