Why the study?
Does segmented 3D DIR-prepared SSFP MR imaging improve carotid wall-lumen contrast-to-noise ratio compared to 2D fast SE sequences in healthy volunteers?
Does segmented 3D DIR-prepared SSFP MR imaging improve carotid wall-lumen contrast-to-noise ratio compared to 2D fast SE sequences in healthy volunteers?
Segmented 3D DIR-prepared SSFP provides higher effective contrast-to-noise ratio for carotid arterial wall imaging compared to conventional 2D fast spin-echo techniques.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
May warrant testing in research protocols; leaves open diagnostic utility in patients with carotid disease.
This HIPAA-compliant study had institutional review board approval. Informed consent was obtained. The purpose was to prospectively evaluate a segmented three-dimensional (3D) double inversion recovery (DIR)-prepared steady-state free precession (SSFP) magnetic resonance (MR) imaging sequence for fast high-spatial-resolution black-blood carotid arterial wall imaging. Carotid wall-lumen contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) obtained with this sequence was compared with those obtained with two-dimensional (2D) single- and multisection black-blood fast spin-echo (SE) sequences. MR imaging of both carotid artery bifurcations over 3 cm of transverse coverage was performed in eight volunteers (seven men, one woman; age range, 26-56 years) with no known history of carotid artery disease. Adjusted for section thickness and imaging time per section, higher effective mean CNR was achieved with segmented 3D DIR-prepared SSFP than with single-section 2D DIR-prepared fast SE or multisection 2D saturation-band fast SE (P < .05). Segmented 3D DIR-prepared SSFP enables black-blood carotid arterial wall MR imaging with contiguous thin-section coverage and greater imaging speed and effective CNR than conventional 2D fast SE techniques.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Koktzoglou et al. (2007) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: