Why the study?
Does compressed sensing acceleration maintain the reproducibility of morphological measurements in 3-D black-blood multi-contrast carotid MRI compared to non-accelerated imaging?
Does compressed sensing acceleration maintain the reproducibility of morphological measurements in 3-D black-blood multi-contrast carotid MRI compared to non-accelerated imaging?
Compressed sensing can significantly reduce acquisition time for 3-D black-blood multi-contrast carotid MRI while maintaining high reproducibility for morphological measurements.
Supports using compressed sensing to shorten carotid MRI scan times without sacrificing morphological accuracy; leaves open.
The purpose of this work is to evaluate the repeatability of a compressed sensing (CS) accelerated multi-contrast carotid protocol at 3 T. Twelve volunteers and eight patients with carotid disease were scanned on a 3 T MRI scanner using a CS accelerated 3-D black-blood multi-contrast protocol which comprises T 1w, T 2w and PDw without CS, and with a CS factor of 1.5 and 2.0. The volunteers were scanned twice, the lumen/wall area and wall thickness were measured for each scan. Eight patients were scanned once, the inter/intra-observer reproducibility of the measurements was calculated. In the repeated volunteer scans, the interclass correlation coefficient (ICC) for the wall area measurement using a CS factor of 1.5 in PDw, T 1w and T 2w were 0.95, 0.81, and 0.97, respectively. The ICC for lumen area measurement using a CS factor of 1.5 in PDw, T 1w and T 2w were 0.96, 0.92, and 0.96, respectively. In patients, the ICC for inter/intra-observer measurements of lumen/wall area, and wall thickness were all above 0.81 in all sequences. The results show a CS accelerated 3-D black-blood multi-contrast protocol is a robust and reproducible method for carotid imaging. Future protocol design could use CS to reduce the scanning time.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Yuan et al. (2017) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: