Why the study?
Does femoral derotational osteotomy improve patient-reported outcomes compared to hip arthroscopy alone in patients with <5° of femoral anteversion?
Does femoral derotational osteotomy improve patient-reported outcomes compared to hip arthroscopy alone in patients with <5° of femoral anteversion?
Femoral derotational osteotomy may provide better patient-reported outcomes than hip arthroscopy alone for patients with significant femoral retroversion.
Femoral retroversion is increasingly recognized as a contributor to hip pain, impingement, and inferior outcomes after hip preservation surgery. Although its natural history remains incompletely defined, biomechanical studies show that retroversion decreases impingement-free range of motion and alters labral contact. Clinical outcomes following hip arthroscopy in retroverted hips have been mixed. Recent comparative studies have reported that femoral derotational osteotomy, either alone or combined with hip arthroscopy, can outperform hip arthroscopy alone in terms of patient-reported outcomes in patients with <5° of femoral anteversion.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Freetly et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: