Why the study?
Engineering applications seek physiological indicators to monitor worker well-being and stress, prompting an assessment of whether heart rate variability can reliably indicate acute work-content-related stress in real time during industrial work.
Can heart rate variability (HRV) measurement serve as a valid and reliable indicator of acute work-content-related stress in industrial workers?
Can heart rate variability (HRV) measurement serve as a valid and reliable indicator of acute work-content-related stress in industrial workers?
Current evidence is insufficient to support the use of heart rate variability as a reliable real-time indicator of acute work-content-related stress in industrial workers.
HRV monitoring may enable real-time work adjustments to reduce acute stress; extends RCT evidence for physiological indicators in occupational settings.
Background:Human workers are indispensable in the human–cyber-physical system in the forthcoming Industry 5.0. As inappropriate work content induces stress and harmful effects on human performance, engineering applications search for a physiological indicator for monitoring the well-being state of workers during work; thus, the work content can be modified accordingly. The primary aim of this study is to assess whether heart rate variability (HRV) can be a valid and reliable indicator of acute work-content-related stress (AWCRS) in real time during industrial work. Second, we aim to provide a broader scope of HRV usage as a stress indicator in this context.Methods:A search was conducted in Scopus, IEEE Xplore, PubMed, and Web of Science between 1 January 2000 and 1 June 2022. Eligible articles are analyzed regarding study design, population, assessment of AWCRS, and its association with HRV.Results:A total of 14 studies met the inclusion criteria. No randomized control trial (RCT) was conducted to assess the association between AWCRS and HRV. Five observational studies were performed. Both AWCRS and HRV were measured in nine further studies, but their associations were not analyzed. Results suggest that HRV does not fully reflect the AWCRS during work, and it is problematic to measure the effect of AWCRS on HRV in the real manufacturing environment. The evidence is insufficient for a reliable conclusion about the HRV diagnostic role as an indicator of human worker status.Conclusion:This review is valuable in the Operator 4.0 paradigm, calling for more trials to validate the use of HRV to measure AWCRS on human workers.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Tran et al. (2023) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: