Why the study?
Does eliminating routine creatine kinase-myocardial band testing reduce healthcare costs without adversely affecting patient care quality in suspected acute coronary syndrome?
Does eliminating routine creatine kinase-myocardial band testing reduce healthcare costs without adversely affecting patient care quality in suspected acute coronary syndrome?
Eliminating routine CK-MB testing in favor of cardiac troponin alone can save healthcare costs without compromising patient safety in the evaluation of suspected acute coronary syndrome.
Supports de-implementation of routine CK-MB testing in EDs; leaves open optimal strategies and outcomes across settings.
Cardiac biomarker testing is estimated to occur in nearly 30 million emergency department visits nationwide each year in the United States. The American College of Cardiology/European Society of Cardiology indicate that cardiac troponin is the biomarker of choice owing to its nearly absolute myocardial tissue specificity and high clinical sensitivity for myocardial injury. Multiple academic medical centers have implemented interventions to eliminate the routine ordering of creatine kinase-myocardial band tests, with published patient safety outcomes data; however, creatine kinase-myocardial band testing is still ordered in many hospitals and emergency departments. Eliminating a simple laboratory test that provides no incremental value to patient care can lead to millions of health care dollars saved without adversely affecting patient care quality, and in this case potentially improving patient care.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Alvin et al. (2017) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: