Why the study?
Does the LAP-BAND adjustable gastric banding system have a low explant rate over 5 years in patients with obesity?
Does the LAP-BAND adjustable gastric banding system have a low explant rate over 5 years in patients with obesity?
The LAP-BAND adjustable gastric banding system demonstrated a significantly lower 5-year explant rate (8.74%) compared to historic rates, alongside sustained weight loss and improved patient-reported outcomes.
Low 5-year explant rates (~9%) support LBS durability in practice; leaves open need for comparative RCTs on effectiveness.
OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to evaluate the real-world safety and effectiveness of the LAP-BAND (Apollo Endosurgery Inc., Austin, Texas) adjustable gastric banding system (LBS) for 5 years following implantation. METHODS: This prospective, longitudinal, phase 4, multicenter study involved 652 patients who had implantation of the LBS system. The primary outcome was the percentage of subjects who had LBS explant over 5 years. The secondary outcomes included the rate of reoperations, clinical and biochemical measures, and patient-reported outcome measures over 5 years. RESULTS: . The primary end point was met with an explant rate of 8.74% (95% CI: 6.6%-10.9%) at 5 years. The rates for completer-only analysis and imputed missing data analysis were 12.81% (95% CI: 9.7%-15.9%) and 12.85% (95% CI: 10.2%-15.5%), respectively. All were significantly lower than the historic rate of 39.4% (P < 0.001). There were 43 patients who required reoperations or revisions excluding explants (6.6%). A mean weight loss of 18.7% was maximally achieved by 2 years, and weight loss was maintained through to 5 years. All patient-reported outcomes showed improvement following LBS treatment throughout 5 years. CONCLUSIONS: This study validates the long-term safety and effectiveness of LBS for the treatment of patients with obesity and its related conditions.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Dixon et al. (2017) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: