Why the study?
Do PPAR agonists have direct antiatherosclerotic effects independent of their metabolic effects?
Do PPAR agonists have direct antiatherosclerotic effects independent of their metabolic effects?
While experimental evidence supports direct antiatherosclerotic effects of PPAR agonists, clinical translation to reduced cardiovascular events remains unproven in short-to-medium term studies.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Supports experimental antiatherosclerotic PPAR effects; leaves open clinical translation to event reduction.
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Peroxisome proliferator activated receptors (PPARs) are ligand-dependent transcription factors that mediate a range of important metabolic functions by transactivation, transrepression or corepression of various gene targets. PPAR agonists also have direct antiatherosclerotic effects, independent of their metabolic effects on glucose and lipid homeostasis. The purpose of this review is to evaluate the currently available evidence for a direct vasculoprotective effect of PPAR agonists. RECENT FINDINGS: Current studies have emphasized PPAR-mediated effects on inflammatory and immune responses, oxidative stress, the renin-angiotensin system and modulation of plaque composition. Furthermore, it has become evident that the relative activation of the different PPAR isoforms and the contribution of transactivation of target genes against transrepression of transcription factors need to be considered when assessing the vasculoprotective effects of PPAR agonists. SUMMARY: It is anticipated that the antiatherosclerotic effects of PPAR agonists observed in experimental studies will translate into reduced cardiovascular events. This promise is yet to be realized in short-to-medium term studies. Given the central role of the PPAR in gene regulation, particularly in metabolic states, it is possible that more targeted modulation of PPAR signalling may hold many rewards for the prevention of atherosclerosis.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Jandeleit‐Dahm et al. (2008) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: