Why the study?
To compare the ability of the DANCAMI, CCI, ECI, and CHA2DS2-VASc score to predict ischemic stroke, cardiovascular mortality, and all-cause mortality after atrial fibrillation/flutter.
Does the DANCAMI predict ischemic stroke and mortality better than the CCI, ECI, and CHA2DS2-VASc score in patients with atrial fibrillation/flutter?
Does the DANCAMI predict ischemic stroke and mortality better than the CCI, ECI, and CHA2DS2-VASc score in patients with atrial fibrillation/flutter?
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
The DANCAMI performs similarly to established indices for predicting stroke and cardiovascular mortality, but outperforms the CHA2DS2-VASc score for predicting all-cause mortality in patients with atrial fibrillation.
Objectives Comparison of the danish comorbidity index for acute myocardial infarction (DANCAMI), the charlson comorbidity index (CCI), the elixhauser comorbidity index (ECI), and the CHA 2 DS 2 -VASc score to predict ischemic stroke, cardiovascular mortality, and all-cause mortality after atrial fibrillation/flutter. Materials and Methods A population-based cohort study of all Danish patients with incident atrial fibrillation/flutter during 2000–2020 (n=361,901). C-Statistics were used to evaluate the discriminatory performance for predicting 1 and 5-year risks of the outcomes for a baseline model (including age and sex) +/- the individual indices. Results For the DANCAMI, the 5-year risk did not increase with comorbidity burden for ischemic stroke (5.9% for low vs. 5.6% for severe) but did increase for cardiovascular mortality (10% for low vs. 16% for severe) and all-cause mortality (33% for low vs. 61% for severe). C-Statistics for predicting 5-year ischemic stroke risk were similar for all models (0.64). C-Statistics for predicting 5-year cardiovascular mortality risk were also similar for the baseline (0.76), the DANCAMI (0.77), the CCI (0.76), the ECI (0.76), and the CHA 2 DS 2 -VASc (0.76) models. C-Statistics for predicting 5-year all-cause mortality risk were lower for the baseline (0.71) and the CHA 2 DS 2 -VASc (0.71) models than for the DANCAMI (0.75), the CCI (0.74), and the ECI (0.74) models. The 1-year C-Statistics were comparable. Conclusion The DANCAMI predicted ischemic stroke and cardiovascular mortality risks similar to the CCI, the ECI, and the CHA 2 DS 2 -VASc. The DANCAMI predicted all-cause mortality risk similar to the CCI and the ECI, but better than the baseline and the CHA 2 DS 2 -VASc.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Bonnesen et al. (2023) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: