Why the study?
This study aimed to examine the effects of manipulating rest intervals during sprint interval training on post-exercise hypotension and within-session oxygen consumption.
Does a 3-minute active recovery interval compared to a 1-minute interval during sprint interval training improve post-exercise hypotension in healthy trained adults?
Does a 3-minute active recovery interval compared to a 1-minute interval during sprint interval training improve post-exercise hypotension in healthy trained adults?
Longer active recovery intervals (3 minutes vs 1 minute) during sprint interval training elicit greater post-exercise hypotension in healthy adults without affecting time spent at high maximal oxygen consumption.
Longer rests in SIT may maximize acute BP lowering in trained adults; extends protocol optimization evidence for cardiovascular responses.
This study aimed to examine the effects of manipulating the rest intervals during sprint interval training (SIT) on post‐exercise hypotension and within‐session oxygen consumption. Thirty healthy, trained adults (aged 30.9 ± 8.7 years; 14 males, 16 females; BMI 22.1 ± 2.3 kg/m 2 ; VO 2 max 50.7 ± 7.8 ml/kg/min) completed two different SIT protocols (4x 30‐seconds all‐out cycling sprints) with a one‐week washout period. Sprint bouts were separated by either 1 (R1) or 3 (R3) minutes of active recovery. Both before and throughout the 45 min after the training, peripheral systolic (pSBP) and diastolic (pDBP) blood pressure, central systolic (cSBP) and diastolic (cDBP) blood pressure, aortic pulse wave velocity (aPWV), stroke volume (SV), and heart rate (HR) were assessed. Throughout the SIT protocols, oxygen consumption (VO 2 ) was monitored. There were no significant differences in time spent at 75%, 85%, 95%, and 100% of maximal VO 2 between R1 and R3. After R3, there was a significant reduction in pSBP, pDBP, cSBP, cDBP, and aPWV. After R1, there were no changes in the respective parameters. There were significant interaction effects in pSBD ( p < 0.001), pDBP ( p < 0.001), cSBP ( p < 0.001), cDBP ( p = 0.001), and aPWV ( p = 0.033). HR significantly increased after both conditions. Only R1 resulted in a significant reduction in SV. Longer resting intervals during SIT bouts seem to result in more substantial post‐exercise hypotension effects. Time spent at a high percentage of maximal VO 2 was not affected by rest interval manipulation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ketelhut et al. (2022) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: