Why the study?
Does ultrasound vascular elastography improve the identification of vulnerable atherosclerotic plaques compared to B-mode ultrasound alone?
Does ultrasound vascular elastography improve the identification of vulnerable atherosclerotic plaques compared to B-mode ultrasound alone?
Ultrasound vascular elastography is a feasible imaging technique that provides additional information beyond B-mode ultrasound for distinguishing vulnerable from stable atherosclerotic plaques, though methodological standardization is needed.
May aid noninvasive plaque characterization in research; leaves open routine clinical use pending prospective validation.
Atherosclerosis is a widespread disease that accounts for nearly 3-quarters of deaths due to cardiovascular disease. Ultrasound elastography might be able to reliably identify characteristics associated with vulnerable plaques. There is a need for the evaluation of elastography and its ability to distinguish between vulnerable and stable plaques. The aim of this paper is to provide an overview of the literature on vascular elastography. A systematic search of the available literature for studies using elastography for assessing atherosclerotic plaques was conducted using the MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane Library and Web of Science databases. A standardized template was used to extract relevant data following the PRISMA 2009 checklist. 20 articles were included in this paper. The studies were heterogeneous. All studies reported that elastography was a feasible technique and provided additional information compared to B-mode ultrasound alone. Most studies reported higher strain values for vulnerable plaques. Ultrasound elastography has potential as a clinical tool in the assessment of atherosclerotic plaques. Elastography is able to distinguish between different plaque types, but there is considerable methodological variation between studies. There is a need for larger studies in a clinical setting to determine the full potential of elastography.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Mahmood et al. (2016) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: