Why the study?
No study has directly compared HPSD versus SPSD contact force-sensing settings in patients presenting for repeat ablation with AF recurrence after initial ablation.
Does high-power short-duration (HPSD) ablation reduce procedure time and improve sinus rhythm maintenance compared to standard-power standard-duration (SPSD) ablation in patients undergoing repeat atrial fibrillation ablation?
Does high-power short-duration (HPSD) ablation reduce procedure time and improve sinus rhythm maintenance compared to standard-power standard-duration (SPSD) ablation in patients undergoing repeat atrial fibrillation ablation?
In patients undergoing repeat atrial fibrillation ablation, high-power short-duration settings significantly reduce radiofrequency delivery time without compromising long-term sinus rhythm maintenance compared to standard settings.
May shorten redo AF ablation times without compromising rhythm outcomes; leaves open confirmation in randomized trials.
Introduction High-power short-duration (HPSD) ablation is a novel strategy using contact force-sensing catheters optimized for radiofrequency ablation for atrial fibrillation (AF). No study has directly compared HPSD versus standard-power standard-duration (SPSD) contact force-sensing settings in patients presenting for repeat ablation with AF recurrence after initial ablation. Methods We studied consecutive cases of patients with AF undergoing repeat ablation with SPSD or HPSD settings after their initial pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) with temperature controlled non-contact force, SPSD or HPSD settings between 6/23/14 and 3/4/20. Procedural data collected included radiofrequency ablation delivery time (RADT). Clinical data collected include sinus rhythm maintenance post-procedure. Results A total of 61 patients underwent repeat ablation (36 SPSD, 25 HPSD). A total of 51 patients (83.6%) were found to have pulmonary vein reconnections necessitating repeat isolation, 10 patients (16.4%) had durable PVI and ablation targeted non-PV sources. RADT was shorter when comparing repeat ablation using HPSD compared to SPSD (22 vs 35 min; p = 0.01). There was no difference in sinus rhythm maintenance by Kaplan–Meier survival analysis (log rank test p = 0.87), after 3 or 12-months between groups overall, and when stratified by AF type, left atrial volume index, CHA 2 DS 2 -VASc score, or left ventricular ejection fraction. Conclusion We demonstrated that repeat AF ablation with HPSD reduced procedure times with similar sinus rhythm maintenance compared to SPSD in those presenting for repeat ablation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Junarta et al. (2021) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: