Why the study?
Sleeve gastrectomy effectively manages obesity, and the authors investigated its outcomes using the comprehensive Bariatric Analysis and Reporting Outcome System (BAROS).
Does laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy improve weight loss, comorbidities, and quality of life in patients with obesity?
Does laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy improve weight loss, comorbidities, and quality of life in patients with obesity?
Laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy provides significant long-term improvements in weight loss, cardiometabolic comorbidities, and quality of life at 45 months, despite a high rate of partial weight regain.
Small sleeve gastrectomy series using BAROS yields preliminary data; leaves open need for larger prospective validation.
Context: Sleeve gastrectomy is an effective method for management of obesity. The Bariatric Analysis and Reporting Outcome System (BAROS) is a comprehensive and standard system for the assessment of outcomes of weight loss surgery. It is consisted of weight loss, changes in obesity-related comorbidities and quality of life measurements. We investigated results of the sleeve gastrectomy based on the BAROS. Material and Methods: Outcomes of laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy surgery was studied in 45 patients with obesity (11 male, 34 female), after 45 months in Turkey. Results: Total weight loss was 26.4±0.1% of body weight at 45 months. Weight regain was seen in 97.8% of the patients with an average 14.5 kg and 13.7% body mass index points. The surgery caused 76% decrease in incidence of obstructive sleep apnea, 73% decrease in type 2 diabetes, 63% decrease in hyperlipidemia and 62% decrease in hypertension. Significant improvement is observed in all quality-of-life parameters. The final score of the BAROS was 4.23±1.02. Conclusion: Based on BAROS, sleeve gastrectomy provides significant improvements in weight loss, incidence of medical comorbidities and quality of life after surgery. Future studies should address prevention of weight regain after the surgery.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Meltem Kayalı (2023) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: