Why the study?
Does pregnancy or estrogen treatment alter vascular pressure-volume relationships in guinea pigs?
Does pregnancy or estrogen treatment alter vascular pressure-volume relationships in guinea pigs?
Pregnancy and estrogen treatment alter vascular capacitance and compliance in guinea pigs, demonstrating that the effects of blood volume expansion in pregnancy differ from the nonpregnant state.
Guinea pig data should not alter human practice; leaves open estrogen-driven capacitance changes in clinical pregnancy.
We investigated the relationship between mean circulatory filling pressure (MCFP) and blood volume in nonpregnant (NP), estrogen-treated (E), and pregnant (P) guinea pigs. Reversible circulatory arrest was produced by rapid ventricular pacing or acetylcholine in unanesthetized animals remote from surgery. MCFP (mmHg) was higher for E (7.1 +/- 0.3) than for NP (5.8 +/- 0.5) or P (5.3 +/- 0.4). The gradient for venous return, the difference between MCFP and right atrial pressure (mmHg), did not differ in NP- (6.0 +/- 0.5), P- (5.8 +/- 0.5), or E- (5.8 +/- 0.4) treated animals. Capacitance, the blood volume (ml/kg) at an MCFP of 6 mmHg, was increased in P (84 +/- 6) and E (89 +/- 7), compared with NP (64 +/- 5) animals. Compliance, the ratio of the change in volume to change in pressure in the range of 6-12 mmHg (ml.kg-1.mmHg-1), was greater in P (4.4 +/- 0.3) than NP (3.5 +/- 0.3) animals. Hexamethonium blockade did not affect MCFP, capacitance, or compliance. We conclude that the effect of blood volume expansion on the circulation in pregnancy cannot be predicted from knowledge of MCFP-blood volume relationships in the nonpregnant animal, because capacitance and compliance are altered. Estrogen administration to nonpregnant animals reproduces some of these effects.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Davis et al. (1989) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: