Why the study?
The impact of physiological variability on pulsed-wave Doppler-derived indices has never been clearly documented, and there is no consensus on which ductus venosus index to use in late gestation.
What is the physiological variability of ductus venosus pulsed-wave Doppler indices in healthy pregnant women?
What is the physiological variability of ductus venosus pulsed-wave Doppler indices in healthy pregnant women?
Physiological variability accounts for 11-15% of ductus venosus pulsed-wave Doppler indices values, suggesting they should be interpreted with caution in clinical practice.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
DV PWD indices show physiological variability in late gestation; leaves open optimal index selection for clinical management.
Despite the near ubiquitous use of pulsed-wave Doppler (PWD) derived-indices as diagnostic tools in clinical practice, the impact of physiological variability upon them has never been clearly documented. Of the PWD ductus venosus (DV) indices, there is no consensus on which to use for clinical management in late gestation. We aimed to report and evaluate the variability of DV PWD derived-indices. 20 healthy, singleton pregnant women at 20 to 37 weeks' gestational age (GA) were recruited. 40 PWD waveforms were stored from each for DV, using a GE Voluson E8 and 2D convex transducer (C4-8D) with machine settings set to ISUOG Doppler guidelines. For each single waveform, systole/atrial contraction ratio (S/a), pulsatility index venosus (PIV), preload index (PLI) and peak velocity index for vein (PVIV) were automatically measured. Coefficient of variation (CoV) was calculated for each index and was linearly regressed versus GA using correlation coefficients (r). 19 patients (95%) provided full data. All indices demonstrated CoV >10% over the study time; S/a showed lowest and PVIV greatest variation across all indices evaluated. There was a range of correlation (r) between the CoV for the indices and gestational age (PVIV = -0.7; PLI = 0.15; PIV = 0.1; S/a = -0.3). All DV PWD indices showed high variability; least for S/a and PLI. S/a variability decreases with GA, potentially representing the best index in terms of variability for late pregnancy evaluation. Physiological variability may account for 11–15% of DV PWD indices values, therefore they should be interpreted with caution in clinical practice. Further studies to assess the relationship between these indices and clinical applicability should be encouraged to define the most reliable DV index.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ferreira et al. (2020) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: