Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
The boundary element tearing and interconnecting (BETI) methods have recently been introduced as boundary element counterparts of the well‐established finite element tearing and interconnecting (FETI) methods. In this paper we present inexact data‐sparse versions of the BETI methods which avoid the elimination of the primal unknowns and dense matrices. However, instead of symmetric and positive definite systems, we finally have to solve twofold saddle point problems. The proposed iterative solvers and preconditioners result in almost optimal solvers whose complexity is proportional to the number of unknowns on the skeleton up to some polylogarithmical factor. Moreover, the solvers are robust with respect to large coefficient jumps.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Langer et al. (2007) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: