Why the study?
Is a 3-month exercise rehabilitation programme feasible and safe for men with coronary disease in a district general hospital setting?
Is a 3-month exercise rehabilitation programme feasible and safe for men with coronary disease in a district general hospital setting?
This study demonstrates that a structured exercise rehabilitation program for post-myocardial infarction patients is feasible, safe, and associated with improved morale and return to work in a district general hospital.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Supports feasibility of post-MI exercise rehab in district hospitals; hypothesis-generating pending controlled trials.
Fifty-nine men with known coronary disease entered an exercise rehabilitation programme. Forty-nine had sustained recent myocardial infarctions, nine had had past myocardial infarcts, and one had had a recent internal mammary implant for severe angina. Each class lasted about 45 minutes and they were held twice weekly; the course for each patient was three months. Sixteen patients dropped out from the course, only three for reasons obviously medical. No deaths or cardiac arrests occurred during the programme. Extrasystoles and angina were detected in a minority of patients and did not constitute reasons for failure to complete the course. The main aim of the study was to show that such a programme is feasible in a district general hospital. Improvement in the morale of patients was impressive and the incidence of return to work high.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Carson et al. (1973) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: