Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Demonstrates a new decision support method for circular economy policy in urban settings, indicating improved data usability.
Municipal scorecards frequently compress heterogeneous smart city and circular economy evidence into composite values that remain difficult to audit, compare, or translate into actionable policy. This article introduces MA-SCC-DSS, a reproducible, maturity-aware decision-support method grounded in Design Science Research artifact logic and informed by ISO 37122 for smart city assessment and ISO 59020 for circularity evaluation. Its methodological contribution is not a new standard or maturity scale, but the executable coupling of standards-informed mapping, evidence-confidence tagging, component-level rule gates, and tiered circularity activation within a traceable score-to-action pathway. The method transforms annual component scores and associated metadata into validated input tables, standards-informed indicator mappings, confidence tags, maturity bands, diagnostic alerts, and a policy-facing roadmap. MA-SCC-DSS was deliberately designed for settings where circularity data are uneven or incomplete, enabling practitioners to begin with aggregated scorecards and progressively incorporate sectoral indicators as richer data become available. The present validation establishes implementation correctness and internal consistency for one three-year illustrative dataset; it does not establish cross-municipality validity.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Nathasia et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: