Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Evaluates the SOCS-A's psychometric properties in U.S. adults, suggesting its effectiveness for assessing appearance comparisons.
Appearance-related social comparison, or comparing one’s body to another’s body, is a risk factor for negative body image and disordered eating. People also compare their current body to their former appearance (i.e., self-oriented appearance comparison), which could also serve as a potential risk, maintenance, or protective factor for negative body image and disordered eating. Yet, there is no existing multi-item measure of self-oriented comparison directions (upward, downward) applicable across diverse appearance-related changes. Therefore, we developed the Self-Oriented Comparison Scale for Appearance (SOCS-A) and investigated its psychometric properties with U.S. community adults in two online studies (Study 1: N = 973; 49.0% women, 48.5% men, 2.5% nonbinary; M age =39.60; Study 2: N = 885; 49.8% women, 48.2% men, 1.9% nonbinary; M age =38.54). Study 1 supported a 2-factor model (upward, downward); Study 2 confirmed this 2-factor structure. Gender invariance, composite reliability, and test-retest reliability were upheld. Convergent, discriminant validity, and incremental validity were supported. Upward self-oriented appearance comparison aligned with maladaptive characteristics (e.g., related positively to upward social comparison, disordered eating, and negative body image and negatively to positive body image, intuitive eating, and well-being), while downward self-oriented appearance comparison was neutral or aligned with positive characteristics. Upward and downward self-oriented appearance comparison accounted for unique variance in body shame, and upward self-oriented appearance comparison accounted for unique variance in disordered eating, beyond appearance-related social comparison and brooding. The 11-item SOCS-A demonstrates strong psychometric properties in U.S. community adults. Continued psychometric and longitudinal research on the SOCS-A is needed in other countries, cultures, and social identity and life experience groups.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Tylka et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: