Develops PiCaRad, a standardized prostate MRI resource to enhance reproducible radiomics research, suggesting improved future studies.
Purpose: To develop PiCaRad, a standardized radiomics-ready prostate MRI resource that facilitates reproducible radiomics research by providing analysis-ready feature matrices, harmonized clinical annotations, and reference benchmark experiments. Methods: PiCaRad was constructed from the publicly available PI-CAI and Prostate158 datasets using a unified PyRadiomics pipeline. Standardized whole-gland and lesion radiomic features were extracted from T2-weighted (T2W), apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC), and high b-value diffusion-weighted (HBV) MRI following quality-controlled segmentation and harmonized preprocessing. The resource integrates clinical variables, acquisition-domain metadata, segmentation agreement metrics, benchmark machine learning models, and domain shift analyses. Whole-gland, lesion-level, clinical, multimodal, unified multi-dataset, and external validation experiments were performed using standardized machine learning pipelines. Results: PiCaRad comprises standardized whole-gland radiomic feature matrices from 1,204 PI-CAI examinations (T2W, ADC, and HBV), 178 expert-derived lesion radiomics cases, 321 AI-derived lesion radiomics cases, and 158 standardized whole-gland T2W radiomics cases from the independent Prostate158 dataset. The resource additionally includes harmonized clinical metadata, acquisition-domain annotations, segmentation quality assessment results, and reproducible benchmark machine learning experiments. Conclusion: PiCaRad provides a comprehensive, publicly available radiomics-ready prostate MRI resource that reduces preprocessing effort and establishes standardized benchmark experiments for reproducible radiomics, machine learning, and future multimodal prostate cancer research.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Mavroforou et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: