Randomized trial examines glycogen use in cyclists during high-intensity exercise with carbohydrate feeding, indicating important effects on muscle energy usage.
We examined liver and muscle glycogen utilisation during high-intensity interval cycling, and the impact of carbohydrate (CHO) feeding, using non-invasive 13 C magnetic resonance spectroscopy (MRS). Following 24 h of standardised dietary intake, nine male cyclists completed 8 x 5-min intervals (1-min recovery), ingesting either placebo (PLA), 60 g maltodextrin (CHO) or 60 g maltodextrin plus caffeine, taurine, l-theanine, l-citrulline and citicoline (CHO+) in a randomised crossover design. 13 C MRS and 1 H imaging were performed pre- and post-exercise to determine liver and muscle glycogen and liver volume, respectively. Liver glycogen utilisation was not significantly different between trials ( P = 0.101) despite lower post-exercise plasma glucagon concentrations in CHO and CHO+ ( P = 0.001). In contrast, muscle glycogen utilisation was significantly lower (~40%) with CHO feeding compared to PLA ( P = 0.006) yet this sparing effect was not evident with CHO+ ( P = 0.073) in accordance with a higher mean power output during the late intervals (+ 2.8%, P = 0.046). Plasma glucose was comparable between trials ( P = 0.175) whereas plasma lactate was higher in CHO+ vs CHO ( P = 0.003), alongside lower blood bicarbonate ( P = 0.005), base excess ( P <0.001) and total CO 2 ( P = 0.004). These findings demonstrate preferential use of skeletal muscle glycogen during HIIT, which is attenuated under conditions of CHO feeding. This sparing effect is, however, not evident with the co-ingestion of a caffeine containing multi-ingredient blend, potentially due to an increased capacity to sustain higher power outputs resulting in greater glycogen utilisation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Hannon et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: