Identifies gaps in biomedical education and proposes a reform model leveraging big data.
The era of big data necessitates a digital transformation in higher education, yet current biomedical curricula in China often fail to meet the interdisciplinary demands of the field. To identify critical bottlenecks, this study conducted a validated questionnaire survey (Cronbach’s α = 0.73) among 108 graduate program applicants from diverse Chinese universities. Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics, Spearman correlation, and multivariable logistic regression to quantify the impact of research experiences on student anxiety. It has been identified that domestic universities exhibit significant shortcomings in several areas, including the curriculum system, practical resources, and mentoring models. The findings revealed that a significant structural deficiency exists, with 70.37% of students lacking systematic big data training. Furthermore, while 62.04% possess only basic experimental skills, only 37.96% demonstrate proficiency in data analysis. Furthermore, 84.26% reported a critical lack of access to experimental equipment, and 81.48% rely heavily on traditional one-on-one mentorship. Notably, students with prior research experience exhibited significantly higher anxiety regarding competitive pressure ( P = 0.039). Addressing these disparities, we propose a “Curriculum-Platform-Evaluation” (CPE) integrated reform model. This framework leverages big data to restructure tiered curricula, establish virtual-physical fusion platforms, and implement dynamic evaluation, offering a scalable pathway for cultivating innovative biomedical talent.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ye et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: