Matched cohort study shows early heparin reduces complications in TBI, suggesting timely intervention improves outcomes.
The optimal timing of pharmacological thromboprophylaxis in traumatic brain injury (TBI) remains uncertain due to competing risks of thrombosis and bleeding. This study evaluated whether early heparin initiation (≤72 hours) reduces vascular occlusive events (VOEs), mortality, and hospital stay without increasing bleeding. We compared early versus late (>72 hours) heparin use via propensity score matching (PSM), subgroup analyses, and multivariable logistic regression. Outcomes included VOEs (deep vein thrombosis, pulmonary embolism, myocardial infarction, and ischemic stroke), bleeding, 30-day and 180-day mortality, and length of stay. After PSM, late heparin was associated with higher VOEs (25.16% versus 12.24%, P < .001), 30-day mortality (20% versus 11.89%, P = .03), 180-day mortality (32.26% versus 19.58%, P = .004), and prolonged hospitalization (median 15.7 versus 9.7 days, P < .001), without increased bleeding risk (22.03% versus 16.77%, P = .24). Subgroup analyses revealed late heparin as an independent risk factor for VOEs in mild TBI (odds ratio 2.62, 95% confidence interval 1.54-4.45; P < .001) regardless of fracture status, coagulation profile, or hemorrhagic classification, with non-significant associations in non-hemorrhagic and moderate-to-severe TBI subgroups. Multivariable analysis identified late heparin, higher comorbidity index, elevated platelet count, and cranial surgery as independent predictors of VOEs, with late heparin also independently associated with increased mortality. These findings suggest early heparin initiation reduces thromboembolic complications, mortality, and hospital stay without significantly increasing bleeding risk, supporting early anticoagulation in selected patients following individualized risk-benefit assessment.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Jiang et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: