Evaluates a low-cost 3D-printed fracture simulator for emergency medicine training, indicating potential educational improvements.
Simulation provides opportunities for repeated practice of procedural skills before patient care; however, commercially available fracture reduction trainers are often prohibitively expensive, limiting access for emergency medicine (EM) training programs. This study describes the development and formative evaluation of a low-cost, 3D-printed distal radius fracture reduction simulator designed using a human factors approach emphasizing functional task alignment and haptic fidelity. The simulator incorporated 3D-printed anatomical structures and a silicone soft tissue envelope, with a total material cost of approximately $100. Six EM attending physicians evaluated the prototype through hands-on use, Likert-type ratings of realism and educational value, and structured interviews. Skin realism received favorable ratings on a 7-point scale ( M = 6.0), while ratings of arm movement ( M = 4.17) and suitability for teaching ( M = 4.83) showed areas for improvement. Expert feedback supported the simulator’s educational potential while highlighting opportunities to improve resistance, traction mechanics, and functional fidelity.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Simoes et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: