Randomized trial demonstrates enhanced flood performance in semi-arid watersheds, indicating improved forecasting reliability.
Accurate rainfall input is critical for reliable flood simulation, particularly in semi-arid watersheds with pronounced spatiotemporal precipitation heterogeneity. This study developed a radar–gauge rainfall fusion framework to improve HEC-HMS (Hydrologic Engineering Center–Hydrologic Modeling System) model performance in the Liulin experimental watershed, Xingtai City, Hebei Province. Radar quantitative precipitation estimation (QPE) was generated via a dynamically optimized Z-I relationship, then fused with gauge observations using three methods—Geographical Differential Analysis (GDA), Conditional Merging (CM), and Random Forest (RF). The fused products drove a calibrated HEC-HMS model, evaluated over five representative flood events. All three methods corrected radar QPE underestimation. Under independent cross-validation, GDA and CM achieved comparable point-scale accuracy (CC ≈ 0.81, RMSE ≈ 5.7 mm), while RF showed lower generalization (CC ≈ 0.48, RMSE ≈ 8.7 mm) due to overfitting. In flood simulations, GDA performed most robustly, followed by RF and CM, all surpassing single-source inputs. Notably, CM’s higher statistical accuracy did not translate into better flood performance, indicating that optimal statistical fidelity does not guarantee optimal hydrological results. Peak discharge deviations persisted for short-duration intense storms and long-duration uneven rainfall events. This study confirms that radar–gauge fusion enhances rainfall input quality and provides a reliable approach for improving flood forecasting.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Peng et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: