Assesses anti-terrorism policy effectiveness in ten countries, suggesting meaningful implications for global safety.
Purpose This study aims to assess the effectiveness of public policies implemented to prevent terrorism in the ten fast-growing countries. Design/methodology/approach The analysis utilizes annual data (2002-2021) from ten countries: Argentina, Brazil, China, India, Indonesia, Mexico, Poland, South Africa, South Korea, and Türkiye. It employs unit root tests to scrutinize whether the impacts of anti-terrorism policies are permanent or transient. Findings The terrorism variable is largely stationary in the ten fast-growing countries. Analyzing the CADF test results for the Global Terrorism Index (GTI) variable reveals distinct stationarity patterns across the panel. (1) In the constant-only model, the GTI variable is stationary at the 5% significance level for Indonesia, Mexico, and South Africa, and at the 10% significance level for China and Poland. The panel stationarity result as a whole is significant at the 1 percent significance level. (2) In the constant-and-trend model, Indonesia, Mexico, and Poland show stationarity at the 10% significance level, while the full panel result is stationary at the 5% significance level. These findings suggest that the impact of shocks from terrorist incidents is temporary which may indicate effective implementation of anti-terrorism policies in these high-growth countries. Originality/value The study addresses a literature gap by examining the stationarity of the terrorism variable. Its recommendations emphasize consistent policy implementation, enhanced international cooperation, and coordinated efforts.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Keser et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: