Randomized trial compares thermal and electrochemical energy storage for solar cooling efficiency, suggesting optimal configurations for seasonal demands.
A solar cooling facility with two forms of energy storage, electrochemical (batteries) and thermal (tanks containing the heat transfer fluid, HTF), is simulated. The technical specifications used in the simulation are taken from a recently installed system in an institutional building at the University of Almería (Spain). Electricity generated by photovoltaic (PV) panels is either stored in a battery bank, or supplied directly to the chiller, which is also connected to the grid as a backup. The HTF circulates through a storage tank and is driven to a heat exchanger to cover the refrigeration demand. The whole system is modeled in TRNSYS with the corresponding meteorological data: the PV array has a peak power of 23.4 kW, the compression chiller power is 70 kWt, and the building demands of refrigeration from high and low season amount to 413.5 kWh/day and 62.8 kWh/day, respectively. The battery bank capacity is 40.8 kWh and the tank has a volume of 4000 L. Different configurations of energy storage (only electrical, only thermal, and hybrid) are tested for both demands. The results show that the refrigeration needs can be covered with solar energy and storage in the low season, with a surplus that can be driven to the building. In the high demand season, an extra input from the grid is needed as the current facility covers 89.3% of the total electricity requirements per day (54.5% if no storage is used). Finally, the system performance is evaluated over an intermediate-demand month. Overall, it is found that electrical consumption from the grid is minimal when batteries are used, either alone or in conjunction with thermal storage.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Castro-Vizcaíno et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: