Evaluates CO hydrogenation to ethanol using Ru dual-atom catalysts, highlighting selective tuning of catalyst properties.
Syngas-to-ethanol conversion is economically attractive yet remains challenging due to limited activity and selectivity under practical conditions. Achieving selective C-C coupling and directing *CHO hydrogenation to ethanol require precise control of active-site geometry and electronics. Here we use a coordination–precursor–mediated strategy to construct Ru dual-atom catalysts on N-coordinated carbon supports with tunable local architectures, where the Ru-Ru separation serves as a primary descriptor—together with coordination environment and intersite electronic coupling—governing cooperative CO/H2 activation and C-C bond formation. Varying the interatomic distance modulates geometric confinement and electronic interactions, improving ethanol formation. Within the optimal reaction window, the catalyst with the shortest Ru-Ru distance exhibits high CO conversion, high ethanol selectivity among oxygenated products, with oxygen-free hydrocarbon products excluded from the selectivity normalization, and stable operation at 1.0 MPa. In situ spectroscopy and DFT reveal that short Ru-Ru spacing enhances d-orbital hybridization and confinement, facilitating synergistic back-donation that lowers the C-C coupling barrier; Bader/charge-density analyses indicate preferential stabilization of hydroxylated intermediates toward ethanol. This work highlights distance-tuned dual-atom cooperativity as a key lever for selective syngas-to-ethanol catalysis. Syngas-to-ethanol conversion is economically attractive yet remains challenging due to limited activity and selectivity under practical conditions. Here the authors construct Ru dual-atom catalysts on N-coordinated carbon supports with tunable local architectures for cooperative CO/H2 activation and C–C bond formation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Zhao et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: