Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Examines how Mandarin nominal headless relatives obtain their lexical categories, indicating unique linguistic features.
This paper examines Mandarin nominal headless relatives, with a focus on how they obtain their lexical categories. I argue that Mandarin headless relatives represent a distinct subtype of [−wh] headless relatives, characterized by two key properties: (i) relativization involves movement, akin to their [+wh] counterparts, and (ii) an additional nominalizer is required, distinguishing them from their [+wh] counterparts. Building on the (re)labeling analysis of headless relatives, I propose that, because dislocated null-operators do not move along with their categorial feature [N], Mandarin [−wh] nominal headless relatives obtain their lexical categories through an external nominalizer that supplies the [N] feature. This contrasts with [+wh] nominal headless relatives, where the overtly fronted wh-word directly provides the [N] feature to the headless-relative node. Besides, I explore how the semantic asymmetries between [+wh] and [−wh] nominal headless relatives can be explained under the proposed analysis.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Chen Chaoyi (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: